The Simple Solution
October 14, 2021

Yet again abuses in the factoring business have had light shone on them, this time in Minnesota, and we can only shake our heads. This is what we’ve been talking about for what feels like an eternity. Minnesotan outrage is absolutely deserved. The state legislature there has already determined that reform is necessary, and we hope they take reasonable, sensible measures that account for the reality of the abuses with proper context. The ultimate question born out of this and every other state that has had reform, though, is will it be enough?


The answer: No.


It's easy to add registration and bond requirements, change the domicile language, or the number of days in a disclosure period while beating our chests about fair competition, but in the end the overwhelming majority of abuse is enabled by a single issue: the lack of redaction of the personal identifying information (PII) in structured settlement agreements and ongoing factoring transactions which permits endless, high-pressure marketing directly to annuitants. Protecting the PII of annuitants doesn’t need to be legislated, though it certainly should be. Those of us involved in the business can and should merely add a single confidentiality page to agreements. If preventing harassment and abuse isn’t cause enough to protect annuitants through confidentiality provisions, we don’t know what is. We don’t need to rewrite SSPAs to get a handle on this when we can police ourselves.


Join us in making this small change. It’ll make a huge difference. Maybe the industry might even get some good press every now and then.

SHARE ARTICLE

Our Recent Blogs

November 28, 2025
It’s a time to be thankful! We’d like to show our appreciation for everyone out there who, like us, is focused on crafting the best solution to our clients’ needs. Moreover, the season demands we take the time to acknowledge a few things. First, and the hard work NSSTA has done to ensure greater fairness in the factoring process. Work in Georgia and Florida to ensure aggressive poaching has been nullified is commendable and should be the standard everywhere. Likewise, a tip of the hat to Texas, whose personal identifying information (PII) protections guarantees that annuitants don’t get harassed ad nauseum from the moment the ink dries on their structured settlement agreements or when they’ve made the decision to cash something out. We’d also like to thank the work of those who go unrecognized too often: the IPAs who help both us and the courts with guaranteeing that our more vulnerable annuitants get the proper added input and security. It’s not required in all states, but we’re sure to use them as often as we can. The best consultation doesn’t just come from us, and we know plenty of clients need that added layer of protection to feel comfortable. Where some may try to lead annuitants away, knowing full well that the deal is a result of their aggressive telemarketing or clever jingles, we know we can trust you and your referrals. They wouldn’t be doing this unless they needed to. Finally, we give thanks to you. Enjoy the turkey, good company, and inevitable food coma. 
November 3, 2025
“Happy Halloween!”
September 19, 2025
Factoring isn’t the boogeyman and structures are not perfect. The best structured settlements are beautiful, but don’t get attached to them. Life happens, and as such it’s life, not factoring, that is the enemy of a structured settlement. The best laid plans, like the best policies, with the best intentions, can’t s
October 11, 2022
Myth: You will lose money by factoring, so take out a loan instead. Reality: Whether you factor annuity payments or take a loan, there is a cost to obtaining money, but many people believe that factoring involves “losing” money. This misconception comes from comparing the cumulative future payments with the present value lump sum payment offered by the factoring company. For instance, if an annuitant has 200 monthly payments of $1,000 , the cumulative payments would be $200,000 . In this case, a factoring transaction might net the annuitant approximately $100,000 or 50% of the cumulative total. This is not “losing” money, it is the result of obtaining future payments early at a 10% discount rate. If instead the annuitant took a $100,000 loan at 10% and paid it back over 200 months , the total cost including interest would also be $200,000 (assuming the annuitant had sufficient credit to get the loan). A loan requires credit, collateral, origination fees, and carries the risk of late fees and foreclosure if payments are not made when due. In the factoring scenario, the annuitant would need to wait 200 months (almost 17 years) to collect the full $200,000 , during which time the equivalent present value of the payments is continually diminishing due to inflation. A dollar will not have the same purchasing power in 17 years as it has today.
Show More
SEE ALL ARTICLES