Legal Databases & Scrapers
November 19, 2019

Factoring industry leaders have made recent overtures towards needed ethics reforms, but they can’t be taken too seriously without the industry properly addressing the root cause of most abuses: court record scraping. We’ve talked about this before. It’s still the number one driver of annuitant harassment and foul, even abusive, business practices. It all stems from access to online legal databases and use of these databases for purposes that are blatantly violating their terms of use at best, and explicitly illegal at worst. For example, these databases specifically prohibit:


Commercial Exploitation – Database firms state that their services are intended for legal, business or scholarly research and analysis. 


…data may not be used for commercial solicitations, marketing, fundraising, or other similar activities.


You will not reproduce, duplicate, copy, download, store, further transmit, disseminate, transfer, or otherwise exploit this website


…whose primary purpose is to perform professional, business or educational, research and analysis, and you are working in a court or government agency; a professional or business corporation, organization or other similar entity


The Content on this Web Site is for your personal use only and not for commercial exploitation.


Legal Violations – Database firms prohibit their services from being used to break the law, but the scraping of these databases is the proximate cause of the relentless phone solicitations that are, for the most part, violations of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). 


You will not use, intentionally or unintentionally any of the content, information, or services on this website in a manner contrary to or in violation of any applicable international, national, federal, state, or local law, rule, or regulation having the force of law.


…and shall not be used for any illegal purpose or in any manner inconsistent with the provisions of these TOS.


Derivative Works – These firms do not allow users to sell products created from their databases, but there are several firms that glean these databases to offer prospect lists of annuitants. 

 

You may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Content, software, materials, or Site in whole or in part.


You may not decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, rent, lease, loan, sell, sublicense, or create derivative works from this Web Site or the Content.


…share, recompile, decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, or make or distribute any other form of, or any derivative work from, the Services, or Content, or any portion thereof;


You shall not sell, license, or distribute Content (including Downloaded Content) to third parties or use Content as a component of or as a basis for any material offered for sale, license, or distribution.


Ultimately, factoring is a legitimate service for certain annuitants in need of liquidity. We maintain that annuitants should be the ones who reach out if they choose to explore that option. Instead, they are constantly subjected to high pressure solicitations through phone calls, junk mail, social media stalking, and even front door visits, all based on information scraped from these databases. 


It needs to stop.


Either online databases need to start enforcing their terms of use or the factoring industry needs to be regulated. Which would you rather have, and which is likely to happen first? Don’t just let us know, let the database providers know. Annuitants will thank you.

SHARE ARTICLE

Our Recent Blogs

October 22, 2026
Back in May, John Oliver closed his segment by proposing that a one-time independent guardian or advisor review every sale before it happens, and a handful of states already appoint ad litems to do something close to it. On paper it's hard to argue with: a court-appointed advisor canvasses the market and makes sure the annuitant walks away with the highest offer on the table. We'd love to tell you it works. In practice, it too often produces the opposite of what it promises. Here's what actually happens when an ad litem "shops the market." The ad litem, who as a rule knows the courtroom far better than they know factoring or finance, solicits competing bids and takes the best one. But the market they think they're canvassing isn't the market that exists. Big players, such as those with a family of companies, operate under enough names that a fistful of "competing" offers can all trace back to the same firm — a point we raised about industry aliases a decade ago, and one a Kiplinger column echoed this past June. The ad litem believes they've run a wide, competitive canvass. Often, they've just collected several quotes from the same house. It gets worse where the competition is real. In the few jurisdictions that mandate ad litems, a dominant firm, and one in particular, can afford to bid below its own cost — not to serve the annuitant, but to win the deal and bleed the legitimate competitors who can't match a rate that loses money. It absorbs those losses on the strength of the notoriously poor deals it writes everywhere ad litems aren't required. Do that long enough and the smaller ethical firms simply leave those markets or leave the business altogether. Once the competition is gone, the "best available rate" is whatever the last firm standing cares to offer, and it’s always the big one with its support cast of companies — which nullifies the entire reason for appointing an ad litem to find the best deal in the first place. The reform meant to guarantee competition ends up quietly strangling it. If that pattern sounds familiar, it should: reforms in this industry have a long habit of ending up as a gift to its biggest players. So no — we don't champion the guardian ad litem. Not because independent advice is a bad idea; it's a fine one. It's because an advisor who canvasses a rigged market and doesn't know the finance well enough to see that it's rigged, isn't the safeguard everyone assumes. The protection that actually works costs nothing and predates all of this: education and a referral. An annuitant should first hear about factoring from the structured-settlement broker who built the annuity, and that broker should refer only to factoring professionals with a clean, ethical record — no court appointment, no cold calls, no counterfeit competition, just a trusted professional pointing the annuitant toward one we'd put our name behind.
Maryland’s Numbers: What 1,800 Transactions Falling to 6 Actually Tells Us - Bentzen Financial
September 17, 2026
Explore Maryland's structured settlement reforms and the reported drop in factoring petitions from 1,800 to six. Bentzen Financial shares key industry insights.
A Decade Later: What We Said in 2014, What John Oliver Said in 2026 - Bentzen Financial
August 20, 2026
Compare Bentzen Financial’s 2014 perspective on structured settlements with John Oliver’s 2026 commentary and what it means today.
AI, Scraping, and the Next Generation of Harassment - Bentzen Financial
July 22, 2026
Learn how AI scraping can create new risks for online harassment, privacy and personal information misuse, and what individuals should understand.
Show More
SEE ALL ARTICLES